Diplomacy Simplified: The Essential English Guide

Pakistan, May 25 — Sometimes it’s necessary to whisper gently. Other times require making a firm impression. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is currently opting for the more assertive approach as he reaches out to leaders in Ankara, Tehran, Baku, and Dushanbe. This couldn’t be timelier.

Due to Pakistan’s genuine narrative, marred by provocations, refined through self-restraint, and obscured by years of erratic communication, this tale frequently remains untold. As Delhi vehemently discusses “terrorism sponsors” and circulates documents within FATF hallways, Islamabad traditionally whispers with partial efforts, preferring behind-closed-doors discussions over proactive diplomatic actions.

When the state eventually sends out a senior delegation equipped not with empty rhetoric but with solid arguments based on legal grounds, evidence, and the visible effects of uneven development across regions, such an effort merits far more than mere courteous recognition. Instead, it calls for comprehensive support from institutions. This includes having a government, a cabinet, and public servants who can endorse diplomatic initiatives with steadfast commitment and align domestic transparency with international reliability.

That won’t come easy.

Even though Islamabad appears stable internationally, the situation remains volatile domestically. A precarious government barely holds onto power. The economy struggles. Furthermore, the nation’s discourse on human rights weakens, particularly when attempting to advocate for stability and humane conduct overseas.

At the same time, India’s approach is quite straightforward. It unilaterally “ suspends” the Indus Waters Treaty. Additionally, it makes another effort to have Pakistan added to the FATF’s grey list. There is silence regarding Manipur, yet loud rhetoric about Balochistan. This double standard is clear but must still be addressed openly rather than discussed in hushed tones.

In this case, the Foreign Office should be recognized for its efforts. For many years, foreign policy has swung from inflated responsibilities to brief media mentions. However, this election signals a shift back to traditional practices: skilled diplomatic work, persistent influence, and sustained promotion of policies over time. No empty catchphrases here; not just aggressive posturing.

However, let’s make this explicit: for the globe to pay attention, Pakistan needs to present a unified stance initially. This involves harmonizing domestic policy disarray with polished international diplomacy. It also entails gaining support from all key political players. Furthermore, it requires viewing human rights not merely as foreign concepts but as essential components of Pakistani values. Additionally, it signifies recognizing that global trust isn’t established solely through formal discussions; rather, it builds in places like Quetta, Gilgit, and Karachi where scrutiny may be minimal. Allow the world to hear their narrative. At last, let them embrace it themselves. *